Editor 1:: A bold argument. However, your wordiness and polished writing skills cannot fool me, the advanced, literate reader, who sees through your academic jargon and recognizes your weak reasoning for what it is – a farce to conceal your own limited understanding of the world. For future readers: this piece fails to address long-term sustainability of clean energy sources like solar and wind power, and fully dismisses the overwhelming scientific evidence of these sources having fewer harmful emissions than fossil fuels. Advancements in technology have made clean energy much more reliable and cost-effective in recent years, as well as less disruptive to ecosystems.[REJECT]

Editor 2: As noted in our submission guidelines, all submissions should be written in terms understandable for the general public. [REJECT]

Editor 3: Excellent writing skills! And such an extensive vocabulary! As for argumentation, you know what they say: practice makes perfect! [REJECT]